EUR-Lex Search results
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
You are here
Search Results
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeal may proceed) of 7 October 2019.
L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.
Case C-586/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:845
- Form:
- Information
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 07/10/2019
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.
Marion Le Pen v European Parliament.
Case C-38/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:952
- Form:
- Information
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 07/11/2019
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 20 November 2019.
Retail Royalty Co. v Fashion Energy Srl.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.
Case C-678/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:994
- Form:
- Information
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 20/11/2019
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.
Rietze GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.
Case C-599/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:903
- Form:
- Information
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 24/10/2019
Order of the Court of 7 October 2019.
L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.
Case C-588/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:843
- Form:
- Information
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 07/10/2019
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 October 2019.
L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.
Case C-587/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:844
- Form:
- Information
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 07/10/2019
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 November 2019.
Indaco Service Soc. coop. sociale and Coop. sociale il Melograno v Ufficio Territoriale del Governo Taranto.
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.
Case C-552/18.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:997
- Form:
- Information
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 20/11/2019
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 October 2019.
Holzer y Cia, SA de CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed).
Case C-582/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:891
- Form:
- Information
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 22/10/2019
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 October 2019.
Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word element Djili — Earlier national word mark containing the word element GILLY — Relative ground for refusal.
Case C-293/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:814
- Form:
- Information
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 02/10/2019
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 October 2019.
Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.
Case C-58/19 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:890
- Form:
- Information
- Summarised document(s):
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 22/10/2019
Query: DTS = 6 AND DTT = CO, Search language: English